This deviation has been labeled as containing themes not suitable for all deviants.
Log in to view

Deviation Actions

idaniphotography's avatar

I'm Under Your Spell

Published:
30K Views

Description

Model:

:iconaisii:
:heart:
:thumb111803213::thumb134549045::thumb120307201:
love you honey, Happy Birthday!

january 2009


© Daniel Ilinca

Image size
600x900px 463.71 KB
Make
Canon
Model
Canon EOS 20D
Shutter Speed
1/60 second
Aperture
F/2.8
Focal Length
32 mm
ISO Speed
200
Date Taken
Jan 31, 2009, 11:23:20 AM
Mature
© 2010 - 2024 idaniphotography
Comments75
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
jackiewelles's avatar
:star::star::star::star::star-half: Overall
:star::star::star::star::star: Vision
:star::star::star::star::star-half: Originality
:star::star::star::star::star: Technique
:star::star::star::star::star: Impact

Not enough could be said about all the beauties a person with insight can find to appreciate from this photo, the lighting, color-mix, backdrop, set choice, model's beauty, pose, expression captured, meanings and absolute little touches of techniques and attention to details in both small and bigger picture that provides just the unexpected impact to make a viewer fall under just the spell of not knowing how to perceive such a unique piece. To suggest for improvement of any sort is to pretend a sense of elitism and living to a typical attention seeking critic's image.

And to the attention seeking self-proclaimed critic who managed to get the first critique in:

"I consider..." "However it would lose the space and diminish the effect"..."My preference would have been to"
It's supposed to be a critique, not an online forum discussion or an art gallery conversation with some colleagues.

"I find...interupts the flow of my eye."
Are you kidding me? I find with the way you spell "interrupt" in a critique about the effect of a picture that interrupts the flow of your eyes as only a 4/5 on Impact a little bit on the hilarious side.

"The fingers pointing into the cheeks seems a little agressive in what seems to be a soft and pleasant image."
And there's no appreciation at all or even a hint that you recognize this train of thought in your own head of um, how in the world did the photographer manage that? Ignorance, pure nonconstructive ignorance.

"Finally I am not sure I like the overall low contrast, especially around her right arm. I think I would have preferred a slightly higher contrast."
Why does this sound like a girl to girl emotional bullying about personal preferences in order to slander someone else? How about I am not sure I like the overall depiction of your pregnant nude woman with head cut off in a dark light of your icon as an artist who advertises "lets arrange to take some photographs."?

"These are just my thoughts on the pciture " "which I did find lovely enough"
And exactly in which one of the absolutely degrading descriptions and opinions of this piece you've spoken has you proven this facade of appreciation?

Lovely and attention seeking self proclaimed critic as usual

Logan